🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, may align so closely with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series launched last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from disorder. While the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of undercutting it. An adaptation based on a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged Putin to take the job. The position was effectively a selection process with many contenders. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist included several politicians, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who studied his rise, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the process said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star popular with viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. Its exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently validate the exact legends it might seek to examine.